Some action needed on node stewards, in terms of structural changes – how to harness vollies so as not to create bottlenecks for us – at scale
Maybe buddy-up node stewards – perhaps get first few done, then get them to buddy up with others – more support
Get off big tech – documentation, tested solutions, say 45 min running parallel with node steward work. Bring in your stuff, cup of tea, documentation.
Linus Users Victoria guys facilitate workshops – getting off Google to something more aligned with our ethos.
Is there someone close to getting across the line for flow-on effect of buddies (while bearing in mind that we need stewards more than nodes).
Bringing in new people to committee
Resources may already be there for getting off big tech. Could run event, then check in every couple of months.
Working group to keep checking in on node stewards
Need group organiser to check in and support – maybe Millie?
Need set of activities to maintain relationship and connection with community activists/members
Difficulty with working groups – finite opt-in commitment can work. Eg sign up to say 3 months’ work – maybe a call out message – for Lores tech and digital justice
Short term for vollies takeover could be problematic and end up creating more work.
Need to discuss tools for recording what we do – check out more options.
How much should we define the direction when we invoke participation?
Unless we have an organiser in each group we could be creating more work for us.
Maybe alternate working groups with Committee meetings?
Where will we (or MBT) be in a couple of years’ time when nodes are humming away – perhaps finetuning conflict resolution or data security issues
Are there two levels of organisation: Strategy, oversight, finance at one level, then node stewards, getting off big tech at another more doing level
Could be self-sustaining projects, maybe fairly independent of MBT, but delegates making high level decisions