Vision
An alternative to Facebook Groups that can be used by specific local organisations and collectives, and offered to others - to support existing and emergent groups.
Example user personas
These groups exemplify our primary target user organisations. These can shape our evaluation and comparison of alternative platforms.
Example user stories
We can prioritise these to identify core functionality and non-essential functionality (e.g. MoSCoW prioritisation)
For more detail, see Use cases for digital town squares
In an emergency
Community emergency announcements
Organising / coordinating volunteers (e.g. community gardening, food parcel delivery)
Alerting neighbours and groups to people in need of assistance
Coordinating community response to requests for assistance
Business as usual
Being used regularly as part of everyday community activities will mean that the platform is familiar and useful to many in an emergency / blackout scenario.
Advertising events, workshops and groups' initiatives to the community
Offering and requesting items, services and assistance (per e.g. Freecycle / Good Karma)
Requesting advice and recommendations regarding local businesses and services
Seeking social connections with neighbours
Community organising: including formal groups and adhoc groups e.g. neighbourhood activities
Discussion of local politics and current affairs ?
Essentials for successful launch and uptake
These could be provided by the platform itself or by supporting services and capabilities
Onboarding plan and functionality
Discoverability: pathways to find things (and the groups and people users new are interested in)
Ability to manage multiple overlapping circles of community, e.g. micro-locality, specific interests etc.
Options for sign-up, sign-in and account management (including provisioning and password resets)
Initial user experience and visual appearance must be acceptable to non-technical users
Needs to be
FOSS, standards based, interoperable, robust
Beyond these, here are several big categories of issues that need to be addressed for successful community-run digital spaces, including:
Online vs real-world identities: policies and enforcement
mitigating bots, bad actors
removing and banning users who behave badly
allowing anonymity for stigmatised and sensitive topics
allowing anonymity for illegal topics, people who would want to hide identity from police, whistleblowing?
meeting U16 social media requirements (legislation and duty of care)
Ease of signup and sign-on vs security
reduce usability barriers for platform signup and sign-on
balance with security: password strength, 2FA, password resets
requirement to provide validated email address?
ability to change email?
Moderating online discussion
establishing enforceable rules that balance community expectations
addressing disinformation / misinformation
encouraging decent behaviour
recruiting, training, retaining volunteer moderators
compensating toxicity vs decent behaviour
Tech skills and capabilities
Ongoing viability and financial considerations
potential uptake for Merri-bek residents: ~20% of 180,000 = 36,000 users.
Ongoing hosting / data centre needs (balancing with contemporary user expectations)
recruiting, training, retaining volunteer mods, admins and tech support ongoing
compensation for workers?
how many mods / admins needed per 1000 users?
Long-term user engagement and utility